July 25 news, earlier this month, a court ruling case recently fire, after the trial, the court found that the seller constitutes fraud, need to return one to compensate three.
July 25 news, earlier this month, a court ruling case recently fire, after the trial, the court found that the seller constitutes fraud, need to return one to compensate three.
According to the Luzhai County People's Court announced the case can be seen, February 15 this year, Mr. Luo because of the care of their own orchard needs, through a second-hand platform in the store opened by Mr. Zhou selected a one-ton miniature miniature engineering crawler multifunctional excavator, the miniature excavator commodity details page contains "crushing/catching wood/rake grass/drilling machine more than just digging! ", the price of 10,000 yuan.
Mr. Luo confirmed with the owner of Mr. Zhou function, configuration, paid 10,000 yuan payment, and generate electronic orders, February 25, Mr. Luo received by courier Mr. Zhou sent a toy excavator, found with their own confirmation of the purchase of agricultural excavators are far from the consultation with Mr. Zhou, in order to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, on April 15 to the court.
Subsequently, Mr. Luo submitted a chat record with Mr. Zhou, proving that before buying the excavator in question to Mr. Zhou asked about the product, Mr. Zhou promised that the excavator can be used in rural orchards, Mr. Luo based on such judgments to buy the excavator, but after receiving the goods found that Mr. Zhou actually sent the goods is a toy excavator, and Mr. Zhou in the platform released and expressed to Mr. Luo information is inconsistent.
The court held that Mr. Zhou's sales behavior has constituted fraud, the verdict of Mr. Zhou returned the purchase price of 10,000 yuan and give three times the compensation, while Mr. Luo returned Mr. Zhou sent to him a toy excavator.